Ability to define pre and post EQ types on captures

[Needthesefeatures]

The usefulness of captures would be greatly enhanced if they included both a pre and post EQ, plus the ability to define what those EQs were (3-band, Mesa 5-band graphic, presence/depth etc).

[tomfs]

New Capture options like some of the Stock captures have

What I would like to see is the option to capture devices with more options( setting) like what they have in real life. Meaning if I capture my Fortin Cali , the capture will have Vol/B/M/T and Gain while the Cali has quite a few more options. The Cali is an extreme example but, there are QC stock captures that have more options than a capture gets as controls. Example: EV101III34 100w Gain-Bass-Mid-Treb-Master-Presence-Resonace-Output PV 5055 Sig 3 ( stock capture) not best sample of a re…

Custom parameters in Neural Captures and descriptions

The list of neural captures is too long to wrap your head around what any of these are and make tweaking things basically impossible (just a moment in time snapshot.) What if when making a capture you could specify that the thing you’re capturing has x number of parameters you’d like to capture. Looking at an Ibanez TS 9 for example: [29a2414665T6pyenFpcASI7sBWwbVbS9ucJiSa6v] I would specify there are 3 dials labeled, Drive, Tone, Level. Then capture says, ok, match the position of each dia…

Asking neural dsp to adress tone capture settings

Since a capture is nothing else than an image of a device pre-setted using a tone stack (amp or OD), the request is to have a selection of usual tone stacks : Marshall, fender, mesa, Diezel, baxandall, and so on. So placing them in front of a capture would allow the user to have the true response of the real amp. Then captures would not have to be multiplicated : users should set all knobs of the real amp’s tone stack at maximum. Because those knobs are pots (variable resistors) users just have…