Fine-resolution time alignment for Splitter paths (Delay block resolution / Phase Doctor enhancement)

Hello,

I’m blending two signal paths on a Splitter — a dry/DI signal and a
Neural Capture path — recombined before output. This is to replicate a
common technique for bass where they use a di signal for lows and a
miced cab for the mids and highs.

The problem: the Capture path has real algorithmic latency (I measured
it directly — a consistent few milliseconds, confirmed via
cross-correlation on identical recorded transients) that the dry path
doesn’t have. Phase Doctor helps rotate phase at a given frequency,
but it can’t fully resolve a broadband timing offset — only a true
delay can bring both paths into sample-accurate time alignment.

The existing Delay block doesn’t solve this either: its minimum usable
increment is far too coarse (7ms) for this purpose, when the actual
offset I need to correct is only 3-5ms. There’s no way to dial in the
fine, sub-millisecond precision this kind of alignment work needs.

Request: either (a) allow finer resolution / direct numeric entry
(down to ~0.1ms or sample-level precision) on the existing Delay
block, especially at small values, or (b) build a small fine-delay
stage directly into Phase Doctor, so it becomes a combined
time-and-phase alignment tool rather than phase-only.

I’ve always kinda suspected this when trying to do a blend. Interesting to see it confirmed. I’ve always avoided using the splitters like this because I felt there was a strange thing it didn’t the signal. Hopefully they can fix the latency. I wonder if it’s how they have the lanes/dsp set up