I doubt it has a screen, especially if they want to keep the price point low.
1 Like
I also got a Core.
It’s ok.
I prefer the QC.
But where the Core is much much better than the QC is in the footswitches options.
Totally free asignaron. With just 5 footswitches you can have 20 scenes. And many more options.
One of them: you can control the blocks with the footswitches: you can select any of them, open it, select a parameter and increase or decrease its value from your stand up position, while playing, so you can fine tune it in a very nice way.
I tell all this just because all of it could be done with the QC.
My only complain with the QC is the footswitches restrictive options. If at least they were freely assignable and had the option of holding them to change to other mode or bank I’d be happy.
Oh, another complain is the unnecessary and obstructive Tap Tempo screen (never seen in the other modellers I’ve had: AX8, sold, Kemper Stage, sold, Headrush Gigboard, sold. Atomic Amplifre 6, I keep it and use it every week onstage for a few reasons. Headrush Core, I’ll probably sell it soon, and QC which I’m very sure I’ll keep).
Sorry but I saw a chance to tell all that and I did.
2 Likes
I agree, Neural can (and should) look at how restrictive the footswitch options are on the QC, especially when ‘lesser’ products are so much more capable in this area
2 Likes