I think creative suggestions a cool feature request and ideas that can potentially improve something is always welcome in any of these forums… But I also think the whingers and constant moaners should be banned delete them they should just move on … I can’t say I have an issue in were the QC is at this moment…
1 Like
Agreed. One of my main issues with the complaints in this forum is that it is a USER forum, with no regular participation of NDSP.
Why users complain to other users about NDSP is something I cannot understand.
I, for my part, do not feel responsible for any real or perceived shortcomings of the QC, or the fact that I still like this unit better than anything else on the market.
8 Likes
If their marketing and sales people are monitoring the discussions going on hear and on Discord and other forums then they REALLY need to do some house cleaning. I only wish when I was in such fields all my customers participated in such forums so I could monitor it.
Have to say I whole-heartedly agree, unless Neural up their game in a big way.
For this very reason I’ve just picked up a Headrush Core to try out. So far I’m not entirely sold on it but it does some things that most other modellers can’t do, such as save loops, and even assign playing a loop to a footswitch.
The frustration with NDSP is it would be so easy to improve the QC UI, add some of the amazing ‘quality of life’ improvements that some of us have been asking for, for years (such as being able to save loops to internal memory), yet they show little interest in doing so…
1 Like
I doubt it has a screen, especially if they want to keep the price point low.
1 Like
I also got a Core.
It’s ok.
I prefer the QC.
But where the Core is much much better than the QC is in the footswitches options.
Totally free asignaron. With just 5 footswitches you can have 20 scenes. And many more options.
One of them: you can control the blocks with the footswitches: you can select any of them, open it, select a parameter and increase or decrease its value from your stand up position, while playing, so you can fine tune it in a very nice way.
I tell all this just because all of it could be done with the QC.
My only complain with the QC is the footswitches restrictive options. If at least they were freely assignable and had the option of holding them to change to other mode or bank I’d be happy.
Oh, another complain is the unnecessary and obstructive Tap Tempo screen (never seen in the other modellers I’ve had: AX8, sold, Kemper Stage, sold, Headrush Gigboard, sold. Atomic Amplifre 6, I keep it and use it every week onstage for a few reasons. Headrush Core, I’ll probably sell it soon, and QC which I’m very sure I’ll keep).
Sorry but I saw a chance to tell all that and I did.
2 Likes
I agree, Neural can (and should) look at how restrictive the footswitch options are on the QC, especially when ‘lesser’ products are so much more capable in this area
2 Likes