@HonestOpinion but there are no administrators so we tag them and they see that the problem exists and is it serious!?
you can email the support, and link the forum discussion.
Then, I think that their explanation here would be a good thing
@HonestOpinion @Ringo itās practically like having a Lamborghini and not being able to go more than 100km/h!
3 Likes
There are Neural eyes and moderators responding to this issue on the forum although contacting support directly is the most effective method for addressing issues.
I suspect this will be a big year for Neural as they clear some of the big hurdles (editor, plugin-on-device, marketplace, etc.) and are able to shift more development cycles onto other things. I donāt feel as if we are being ignored, just that requests are being prioritized. Glad to see some attention from the community on latency reduction. Itās one of those under the hood things that doesnāt make the car any prettier, just a lot more fun to drive.
2 Likes
Iāve just linked this topic to the support email 
I really hope for these improvements :
reduced latency
swapping presets into playlist
an output level also for delays
better reverb algorithms
properly unity gain of FX Loops
fastest presets changes
Takes time but in Neural DSP we trust !
2 Likes
off topic
info for all,
i donāt know them personally,
but Andrea āRingoā Rigonat and Davide Aru are gtr player with high and great weight in italian music āsceneā.
Very experienced musicians.
stop off topic =)
3 Likes
This is posted under a feature request for QC, not a bug. If this is a probable bug, please email support@neuraldsp.com for resolution. Also, please do not tag NDSP staff unless they post within this thread, otherwise all tags will be removed. I have forwarded the latency testing/diagnostics to NDSP support staff etc. Thanks!
Hi,
anyone has a SPECIFIC preset on row 1 and 3 that causes 10ms of latency to share?
I have built a personal diy analog splitter with 2 outs (with decoupling transformers on outs) and i want to try
to measure this behaviour on my unit with the two lines in parallel
Thanks in advance, iāll post here my result on the specific preset.
Nik
10ms and under is generally regarded as acceptable for everything including vocals, although some people will notice it in a vocal performance. For guitarists or bass players, a small amount of latency is something we deal with literally every time we pick up the instrument due to distance from the speakers. Itās probably still noticeable with a click a headphones or close-proximity speakers, but Iām not so sure itās enough to disturb a performance in most cases.
But thatās just me. Back when I was first fiddling with digital models, Iād use my PC to load amp models and learned to be okay with closer to 50ms of delay because my laptop was a toaster and Iād play along with quite a few effects that utilized lookahead in the DAW. Dunno what led me to believe 10ms of lookahead on a compressor and another 10ms on a limiter while playing along was a good idea, but I digress. Just because I forced myself through that abysmal trench of a scenario doesnāt mean itās a good idea and doesnāt mean itās feasible in many cases. 
1 Like
I have a 9.75ms preset for you.
You need to follow me to be able to grab it.
(I just followed you a minute ago)
Downloaded
In the weekend iāll try to measure
My path Will be
Guitar-- analog splitter
Out 1 ā cubase 12
Out 2 ā qc with your preset with all on ā cubase 12
I Will post my difference on two armed tracks
Editā¦
Also i think that blocks on or off doesnāt introduce CPU loadā¦they are Always loadedā¦then Better all off as you native patch to better compare
Some kind of phase compensation would be ideal in the next big release.
Yes, when I did some tests a while ago, I noticed that turning on/off the blocks did not affect latency, like you said, they are always loaded.