I had assumed that this was what the classifications introduced in 2.0 would have clarified, but now I am not so sure.
I had assumed that:
- “Combo” meant, the capture of a combo: Amp & Cab
- “Amp” meant the capture of an amp: Amp & no Cab
- “Amp+Cab” meant, well… and amp & a cab
With this mindset, I assumed that “Combo” and “Amp+Cab” were captures that included the cab within the capture, and “Amp” wither meant an amp head, or a combo amp with a bypassed cab.
However, I feel I might be incorrect with these assumptions. Do these classifications have ANYTHING to do with the capture being direct or not? If not… what is the purpose of them? Is the purpose literally just to let the player know what the physical amp looked like? I hope not because, quite frankly, that is absolutely worthless. I dont care what style of amp it use to be. It’s all digital, the only differentiation that we need to care about now is weather it’s a capture of (1) a direct amp, or (2) the capture of an amp and a cab.
This came about when I was going through Neural’s factory HRD captures and couldnt understand why these “Combo” captures sounded so terrible… as if they didnt even have a cab. Then I found out that these captures DID NOT in fact include a cab. So either (1) there is no way to label a capture as including or not including a cabinet, or (2) my initial assumptions, above, were correct but the HRD is merely miscategorized in the QC