I have used helix , headrush, axe fx 2 and other plugins…
I would say just do what headrush does. It is just excelent. I was also a beta tester for HR. Also, i am not brand loyal so sold HR for Axe fx 2 for more amp and modeling options.
With scenes, its great that QC is like snapshot in helix. Its way easier than the fractal scenes. But headrush has this one thing like axe fx where you can also change the amp itself according to the scenes with its own parameters but It doesnt have to have 4 channels like in axe fx.
It just saves the amps like a normal scene. If not, having 4 channel per block would also be very powerful and make QC more desirable.
Also, for the file editor on pc. Make it like headrush where u have a folder for ir, preset and so on and then u can just drag and drop.
Also, hybird mode like headrush where u can assign anything to a switch like scenes, paramter , bypass and so on.
Since i came from fractal , i can say that if the effects options grows and improves , QC will really mess up axefx user base.
As in QC you can have unlimited amount of Amps due to captures so it can match axefx but u cant capture effects like delay , reverb. Just focus on these kinda effects and surely QC will be on top.
Deep parameters are not so much important if the efrects are great from get go.
I bought QC because i am not in the waiting list for fm9 so after I sold my Axe fx 2. I was looking for options and QC started being in stock so reluctantly bought it.
All i have to say is its really good and beats the axe fx2 but still doesnt compare to the effects in Axe fx2 let alone Axe fx 3. Thanks for all your hard work.