I don’t think this is possible yet since every split into the second row automatically uses all blocks of that row. If not please correct me.
Correct, there’s currently not a way to do this. But I think this feature request below should be able take care of that.
1 Like
Let me know if this request needs to close. Thanks!
the workaround for now is to change “Out1” to “row 3” and then duplicate the split on Row 3, but that takes up a lot more real-estate.
It needs to be merged with the other one. Isn’t that possible?
Hey @steeldom, just to be clear, the amp blocks are mono… In your example it looks like you’re trying to run your outputs in mono (Out1 to a power amp and cab, Out2 to some FRFR device or FOH).
But I can’t wrap my head around the two inputs. Those are going to get summed to mono once they hit the amp block together. Is that what you’re going for?
Hi, yes exactly.
Although it could also be both rows input 1 to have preamp effects in parallel.
The FX blocks in my graph are also just an example. This could very well be used as a post amp section overall where you have effects in parallel, then a common stereo effect and then a split to have a signal for FOH and one for the amp FX return.
If we can get multiple mixes and merges in one pair of rows the number of possibilitys increases immensly
1 Like
Hi yes the feature request above is doing exactly what I want. Can these two be merged?
1 Like