Line 6 just threw the gauntlet down with their Helix replacement. Capturing, backing track player with full automation such as changing preset for verse chorus etc, Bluetooth, WiFi the list goes on
2 Likes
4 Likes
Im not sure about capturing abilities as it was kind of vague but great time to be a musician with all the great choices available for everyoneâs workflows.
1 Like
The bean has come a long way! Loved my bean(s)
2 Likes
Live stream with a lot of info on Helix Stadium starting at the 36:00 mark. Impressive stuff.
1 Like
Some true innovative things are coming on the new Line6 platform⌠NeuralDSP better pay attention and catch up.
Weâre still waiting on those bloody plug-ins that are soooo hard to get done. I wouldnât call that innovation tbh. Itâs a distractionâŚ
A lot of people will switch to the new thing if it sounds any good⌠especially since the platform is way way more mature
10 Likes
Line 6 Helix series has always set a high standard when it comes to footswitch functionality and customizability. The depth of what you can assign to each switchâsnapshots, stomp mode, command center for MIDI, external control, etc.âgives users a ton of flexibility, especially in live settings.
In contrast, while the QC is incredibly powerful in terms of processing and tone quality, its footswitch flexibility still feels more limited by comparison. The rotary encoder switches are clever, but users have consistently asked for deeper customizationâmore macro control, MIDI expansion, and better snapshot/stomp hybrid workflows.
If Line 6 is pushing footswitch functionality even further with the next-gen Helix, itâs a clear challenge to Neural to step up. Hopefully, Neuralâs upcoming software updates bring significant improvements in this area. It has been way too long of a wait.
5 Likes
looks good but I donât get the gushing over it tbh lots of features that even chineseium modellers have now.
QC is still plenty powerful with potential to grow if it ever gets updates and if there is a new hardware iteration at some point they could learn some things for sure
The features they have for Helix Stadium are wild. Love the QC, but this feels like a total game changer tbh
4 Likes
Iâll be honest : iâm really impressed by the new Helix. It has everything , except the form factor, to be the QC Killer.
A lot of clever ideas : builtin explanation of every knob is really nice, the âmorphingâ feature, cloud based capture for better quality and less local processing, the stem separation thing (having an integrated neural processor builtin helps a lot)
NDSP should really deliver something big for everyone , not just for PlugIns owners, otherwise the amount of sh*t theyâll receive will be well deserved !
I really hope that 3.2 will add a lot of new blocks (effects, amps, synth) for everyone and not only for Plugins owners (and I own a lot of plugins, so iâm not talking for myself) , because since 3.0 the non-plugins users have been left on the side. (and even since the 2.1 release, the amount of new effects/amp is really low, imho)
Come on NDSP, the QC could be much better than it is today !
Iâm not overly optimistic for the 3.2 release schedule, as 3.1.1 will be released before, it would not make any sense to release 3.1.1 and 3.2 one or two weeks apart. The â3.2 released shorly after 3.1.1â sentence reminds me of all the âsoonâ bshit we all heard too often anyway⌠(and donât get me started with the âwe are shifting gears to deliver more frequent updateâ , we already heard that in the â2.0â era)
13 Likes
It looks like they took feature ideas from all the major players and added more of their own. They donât list dimensions but it looks like the smaller unit is closer to the QCâs form factor or maybe Tonemasterâs. Sweetwater is taking pre-orders for a fall ETA. Did you see the prices at the bottom of the Stadium webpage? $1800 and $2200 USD. It doesnât say if thatâs retail or the estimated selling price. With the tariffs, Line 6 may not know thir production cost yet. I love the sound and UI of my QC but, man, so many OS shortcomings and development has been like frozen molasses. I my have to check out a StadiumâŚeventually.
2 Likes
This thing is really cool! Really innovative and it seems they got everything right, where others miss one or two things.
For sure this Unit will sound awesome - no doubt. Line 6 is in the Game for so long, they will deliver.
Iâll stick with the QC for the next time - just because iâm used to it. But maybe if iâm hyped enough and iâll get to test the Line 6 iâm switching. Not because i dislike the QC, just because i like those QoL Things theyâve integrated.
But NDSP really has to deliver some up to date features which are highly requested (button assignments, playback, QoL stuff, more fx especially synth)
5 Likes
From what Iâve heard Neural has snapped up a load of the TC engineers, after Behringer closed down the R&D centre in Denmark.
Letâs hope all that TC knowledge can push Neural to new a greater things.
3 Likes
The thing that has always put me off of Line6 is the sound. It has never sounded right, and always has a digital undertone that cannot be gotten rid of. They know its true, otherwise why does the stadium have a completely new algorithm that is NOT backwards compatible?
As far as âthis is a _____ killerâ - grow up. No manufacturer is going to âkillâ all of the others. They all have their strengths. Most sound very good these days. Line6 has a huge following due to (I think) the access to cheaper levels of gear. Those that can afford he Helix are already whining about the $2200 cost. But if you are seriously in this space you gotta pay to play.
I would not be selling my QC for the bells and whistles of this thing without hearing the sound, and waiting to see if the Proxy capturing is any good. And even then, canât see giving up my QC for it. I would only possibly, add it to my arsenal.
The last thing I will say about it, is that it is presently half baked. It will sell in the Fall WITHOUT Proxy Capturing capability⌠they are still testing. With only 16 amp models that run the new Agoura algorithm (Old Models are there), So they are releasing the product with promises. Sound familiar?
7 Likes
No doubt, for my money, the QC modeling sounds better than the current Helix but weâre talking about 10+ year old technology. When Helix was introduced, it was, arguably, the best sounding modeler out there. Iâm curious to hear what Line 6 comes up with. BTW, I got a reply from my Sweetwater Sales Engineer, $1800 US and $2200 US will be the selling prices so I wonât be switching any time soon. 
I hadnât heard about Neural picking up the TC engineers. Very interesting! Hopefully they can help speed the development process.
Totally agree - the new Helix isnât pretty, in the way the QC is, but I for one have become increasingly frustrated with the snail-pace speed of updates for the QC, and more importantly how most of the updates seem to overlook the things I consider important, like footswitch functionality, or even just tidying up the sometimes downright quirky UI, instead going for the headline grabbers, such as PCOM.
The biggest thing that interests me with the Helix Stadium is the Showcase feature; being able to load backing tracks in to the unit (Headrush have had this a little while) is a fantastic feature for my use case, but to be able to flag things on the track, such as Scene (Snapshot in Helix language) changes, Looper functions etc is an absolute game-changer. BUT⌠in theory the QC can do this too; there has been various threads here talking about the inbuilt SD card on the QC, and how there might be the possibility of storing sound files too it / looper recordings etc. Then it would be fairly simple thing youâd think to add the ability of assigning scenes to recordings etc.
3 Likes
This is my view. In form factor and inputs, the QC wins hands down in my view. After that itâs software which in theory a lot of what the line 6 does should be achievable. Showcase is a game changer for me to. Iâm using Jamzone on an iPad or use Moises to separate stems. Having it in the QC would be amazing and I donât see why they couldnât do it Also agree with the pace of updates. Ideally Iâd like to stick with QC due itâs hardware but by this time next year software/Features/UI are broadly the same I will switch
2 Likes
Makes sense Line 6 would have a new modeling algorithm haha. Helix has been out for 10 years, not even counting the years of research they would have had beforehand. I wouldnât count their previous amp models sounding less accurate than Neural as a negative. Theyâre clearly trying to innovate. I think Line 6âs effects (aside from the modulation) is better than Neural though. Neural still needs to figure out a polyphonic pitch shifter, fixing the wet/dry mix of their delays/verbs, and creating some better algorithms for them.
I support the desire for innovation, and youâd probably still have a negative to say about Line 6 even if they didnât update their modeling algorithm haha.
I think the competition that the Stadium adds to other modelers now is amazing. The price of the non XL unit also isnât as big an issue as other are making it seem. The QC can maybe do half of what the stadium canâŚ.and is almost the same price (not to mention the Stadium has the IEC power cable which is awesome).
Of course Neural seemingly has less resources, but somehow they were able to make better amp models than a much larger company. Hopefully they can use that knowledge to get the Quad up to snuff.
If the Stadiumâs models are on par with Neural + the DSP gets improved, I would absolutely consider switching back to Line 6. The quad is still leaps and bounds better to me than the Kemper, Headrush, Tone Master, or Fractal.
3 Likes
To the contrary. I am not a fan boy of any brand. If it sounds great I will get one to add to my arsenal.
2 Likes