# Serious latency issues

**URL:** <https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/serious-latency-issues/10640>\
**Category:** Support\
**Tags:** feedback, quad-cortex, support\
**Created:** [April 5, 2023, 6:05pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/serious-latency-issues/10640 "2023-04-05T18:05:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![xush](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/xush/32/5100_2.png) [@xush](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/xush)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2023, 4:07pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/serious-latency-issues/10640/10 "2023-04-14T16:07:55Z")

</div>

have you guys voted on the Feature Requests that deal with QC latency?  
This is the proven method for getting results from NDSP-  
if you haven’t voted to raise awareness of those requests, you might want to consider it.  
They seem to be giving priority to issues/features that get the most votes.

> [@Latency Monitor rather than a CPU Monitor (or both if possible)](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/latency-monitor-rather-than-a-cpu-monitor-or-both-if-possible/10330/7):
>
> Please don’t get too hung up on measuring latencies! I know many professional guitar players who use a digital wireless system, a digital effects and/or amp modeller, goes into a digital mixing desk, and uses digital IEM. Each component in that chain is adding latency, but it’s not perceived as a problem by the guitar player. So many of us will not have a problem with the latencies in the QC and those who are sensitive to even the lowest latencies will know if the latency is to high when the…

> [@Low Latency Mode (and power mode?) for QC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/low-latency-mode-and-power-mode-for-qc/9213/22):
>
> you can use reaper and reainsert to measure it if you’re really curious

---

_[View the full topic](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/serious-latency-issues/10640)._
