# Improved Capture Process/Results **URL:** \ **Category:** Quad Cortex\ **Created:** [August 29, 2023, 7:24pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improved-capture-process-results/11806 "2023-08-29T19:24:51Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 2
**Author:** ![DiffractionCircuit](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/diffractioncircuit/32/3793_2.png) [@DiffractionCircuit](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/DiffractionCircuit)\ **Post date:** [August 29, 2023, 7:40pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improved-capture-process-results/11806/2 "2023-08-29T19:40:21Z")
Here’s a recent large thread on the topic of capture accuracy and people’s experiences with QC: > [@Neural Capture: accuracy enhancements to keep up with competition (ToneX, NAM etc)](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/neural-capture-accuracy-enhancements-to-keep-up-with-competition-tonex-nam-etc/10742): > > The profiling scene now consists of several products, paid like ToneX or free like NAM, which are closer to the source amp (when trying to profile hi-gain direct settings) than the Neural Capture feature. While those products do take longer to train the models, the resulting digital tone print is pretty close to the source & more consistently so. Is there room for NDSP to bring enhancements to the QC Neural Capture feature (longer training signal or more epochs etc) to catch up with what the co… --- _[View the full topic](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improved-capture-process-results/11806)._