# Improve the tuner please!

**URL:** <https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improve-the-tuner-please/21198>\
**Category:** Feature Requests\
**Tags:** quad-cortex\
**Created:** [February 10, 2026, 7:21pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improve-the-tuner-please/21198 "2026-02-10T19:21:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fbdreamer85](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/fbdreamer85/32/9775_2.png) [@Fbdreamer85](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/Fbdreamer85)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2026, 7:21pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improve-the-tuner-please/21198/1 "2026-02-10T19:21:09Z")

</div>

I suggest improving the tuner on the Quad Cortex. It’s slow and sluggish! This obviously makes it less useful in live situations! I think this is something that can be largely solved with some new updates 😉 I have the latest firmware…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SelfTitledLP](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecc23a/32.png) [@SelfTitledLP](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/SelfTitledLP)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2026, 7:23pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improve-the-tuner-please/21198/2 "2026-02-10T19:23:54Z")

</div>

Interesting, I actually find the tuner to be very fast. I remember an older update had made it lag a little, but they seemed to fix that. Unless the newest update has changed that to have the lag again?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fbdreamer85](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/fbdreamer85/32/9775_2.png) [@Fbdreamer85](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/Fbdreamer85)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2026, 7:25pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improve-the-tuner-please/21198/3 "2026-02-10T19:25:06Z")

</div>

Ohh yes the tuner is slow… and it have lag! 😕

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MP\_Mod](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ccd318/32.png) [@MP\_Mod](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/MP_Mod)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2026, 8:05pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improve-the-tuner-please/21198/4 "2026-02-10T20:05:21Z")

</div>

For me (and others I have asked recently), the tuner is locked on, doesn’t drift and seems to be as accurate as my Peterson tuner.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fbdreamer85](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/fbdreamer85/32/9775_2.png) [@Fbdreamer85](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/Fbdreamer85)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2026, 8:25pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improve-the-tuner-please/21198/5 "2026-02-10T20:25:47Z")

</div>

Locked on? What do you mean? I noticed that even if I play a string and tuning it 2 seconds later it is out of tune or in any case different from how it was before… it is not very fluid… this makes it very uncomfortable during a live!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SelfTitledLP](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecc23a/32.png) [@SelfTitledLP](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/SelfTitledLP)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2026, 8:56pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improve-the-tuner-please/21198/6 "2026-02-10T20:56:16Z")

</div>

Are you saying that the tuning of the string drops lower after the string rings for a couple seconds? Because that’s a more so an issue with the guitar itself

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![xush](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/xush/32/5100_2.png) [@xush](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/xush)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2026, 8:56pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improve-the-tuner-please/21198/7 "2026-02-10T20:56:55Z")

</div>

Can you verify it’s only set to one input? My bandmate had trouble when it was inadvertently set to an input pair.

Also helps to pluck repeatedly instead of just letting one note ring out

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fbdreamer85](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/fbdreamer85/32/9775_2.png) [@Fbdreamer85](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/Fbdreamer85)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2026, 9:12pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improve-the-tuner-please/21198/8 "2026-02-10T21:12:27Z")

</div>

Obviously I know my guitar well and I did the test at the same time with a clip tuner and with the tuner of my kemper… the one of the Quad cortex has very annoying lags…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fbdreamer85](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/fbdreamer85/32/9775_2.png) [@Fbdreamer85](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/Fbdreamer85)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2026, 9:15pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improve-the-tuner-please/21198/9 "2026-02-10T21:15:24Z")

</div>

Thank you for your answer… the Quad cortex is set only with an input (input 1) and of course I repeatedly play the string while i’m tuning…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SelfTitledLP](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecc23a/32.png) [@SelfTitledLP](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/SelfTitledLP)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2026, 10:02pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improve-the-tuner-please/21198/10 "2026-02-10T22:02:21Z")

</div>

Just saying if it’s dipping in tuning as the string rings out, that wouldn’t be a tuner issue

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fbdreamer85](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/fbdreamer85/32/9775_2.png) [@Fbdreamer85](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/Fbdreamer85)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2026, 10:12pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improve-the-tuner-please/21198/11 "2026-02-10T22:12:22Z")

</div>

Unfortunately it’s a problem with the Quad cortex tuner… with the kemper or my clip tuner I don’t have this problem…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DiffractionCircuit](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/diffractioncircuit/32/3793_2.png) [@DiffractionCircuit](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/DiffractionCircuit)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2026, 10:20pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improve-the-tuner-please/21198/12 "2026-02-10T22:20:01Z")

</div>

Show us a video of what you’re talking about, seems like nobody else is having tuner issues on the QC.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jams419](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/jams419/32/9118_2.png) [@Jams419](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/Jams419)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2026, 10:37pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improve-the-tuner-please/21198/13 "2026-02-10T22:37:11Z")

</div>

I would love to see an update to the tuner. I currently run a Peterson tuner next to the QC because I don’t like the onboard one. I am sure they could easily improve the tuner, maybe add a strobe function.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SelfTitledLP](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecc23a/32.png) [@SelfTitledLP](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/SelfTitledLP)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2026, 10:50pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improve-the-tuner-please/21198/14 "2026-02-10T22:50:19Z")

</div>

The issue is that the QC tuner shows the pitch dropping flat as the string rings out? The headstock tuners usually don’t display that unfortunately, since they’re not as sensitive. I’m saying that having used much more accurate tuners such as Peterson and Kemper rack, which do show that pitch dip.

Unless you’re experience a delay with the tuner registering the note. Just a little confused on the exact issue

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NeuralDave](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/e9a140/32.png) [@NeuralDave](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/NeuralDave)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2026, 1:00am UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improve-the-tuner-please/21198/15 "2026-02-11T01:00:13Z")

</div>

Who needs a tuner anyway!?

I tune my guitars once at the beginning of the year. For the remainder of the year I just bend my strings in tune while I’m playing 😎

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/neuraldsp/original/2X/2/2d13268b3df42b1ef369d5be6f53af7c7e0ddfca.jpeg)

j/k

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MP\_Mod](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ccd318/32.png) [@MP\_Mod](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/MP_Mod)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2026, 3:49am UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improve-the-tuner-please/21198/16 "2026-02-11T03:49:08Z")

</div>

I mean that when I use the tuner, it locks on to the note very quickly and doesn’t drift. I used to have to pluck the string continuously in order for the tuner to lock on to the note, even then it was always accurate and drifted just every now and then. Currently, I have successfully tuned hitting the string once or twice when tuning and it matches my Peterson strobe. I do agree with having a strobe feature which is what you requested initially as I do see the value and prefer the strobe style tuner. I would also like to see support for Buzz Feiten offset tunings as well as others.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aviraleads](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/6f9a4e/32.png) [@Aviraleads](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/Aviraleads)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2026, 3:28pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improve-the-tuner-please/21198/17 "2026-02-12T15:28:12Z")

</div>

Seems to work totally fine with my trash guitars..and my trash playing. I have a strobe tuner as well and shows the same readings almost immediately.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ztevie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/90ced4/32.png) [@Ztevie](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/Ztevie)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2026, 3:43pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improve-the-tuner-please/21198/18 "2026-02-12T15:43:02Z")

</div>

I have to agree a little bit here. My polytune 3 it’s very fast and extremely stable. The QC tuner is slow and take it’s time to wonder around before it settles. It does seem to be pretty correct though, once it’s decided to stop.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SelfTitledLP](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecc23a/32.png) [@SelfTitledLP](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/SelfTitledLP)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2026, 4:45pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improve-the-tuner-please/21198/19 "2026-02-12T16:45:47Z")

</div>

Interesting. I can’t stand the Polytune. It’s so slow to react to the note and always jumped weirdly when it thinks you’re playing all the strings, so the note just flashes on the screen

I tested the QC tuner with the Kemper (which is an extremely fast one) and they read at the same speed/accuracy…..

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ztevie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/90ced4/32.png) [@Ztevie](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/Ztevie)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2026, 5:21pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improve-the-tuner-please/21198/20 "2026-02-12T17:21:53Z")

</div>

Oh… I don’t feel that at all. It’s really fast, very stable, don’t move around at all and it holds the tone until it’s totally ringed out. The QC on the other hand takes it’s time to settle and dies quicker. I think it was the d or g string I have to hit pretty hard to even get it to read anything at all…

[Next page](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/improve-the-tuner-please/21198.md?page=2)
