# Consistent tuner notation

**URL:** <https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/consistent-tuner-notation/6800>\
**Category:** Feature Requests\
**Created:** [February 21, 2022, 9:56am UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/consistent-tuner-notation/6800 "2022-02-21T09:56:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DavidFuss](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/davidfuss/32/3846_2.png) [@DavidFuss](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/DavidFuss)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2022, 9:56am UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/consistent-tuner-notation/6800/1 "2022-02-21T09:56:21Z")

</div>

CorOS 1.3.2: currently the tuner shows up mixed pitch notation for different strings/pitches. On other modelers, you can decide whether you prefer a sharp notation or flat notation. It is a little bit confusing that the QC shows a drop F# tuning as follows:

QC: F# C# F# B E **Ab** C#  
Expectation: F# C# F# B E **G#** C#  
Or: Gb Db Gb B E Ab Db

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MP\_Mod](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ccd318/32.png) [@MP\_Mod](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/MP_Mod)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2022, 2:29pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/consistent-tuner-notation/6800/2 "2022-02-21T14:29:55Z")

</div>

Hi David,  
Welcome to the community and thank you for the suggestion! Don’t be afraid to reach out to the support team for any questions or issues you may come across and keep those suggestions coming! 😀

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DavidFuss](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/davidfuss/32/3846_2.png) [@DavidFuss](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/DavidFuss)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2022, 8:55am UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/consistent-tuner-notation/6800/3 "2022-03-08T08:55:52Z")

</div>

@MP_Mod would you say this is an issue/bug or still a feature request?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MP\_Mod](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ccd318/32.png) [@MP\_Mod](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/MP_Mod)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2022, 2:48pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/consistent-tuner-notation/6800/4 "2022-03-08T14:48:07Z")

</div>

I wouldn’t say it’s a bug but more of incorrectly labeling some notes on the tuner so feature request is probably best. You could always reach out to support via email and see what they say.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DavidFuss](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/davidfuss/32/3846_2.png) [@DavidFuss](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/DavidFuss)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2022, 3:47pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/consistent-tuner-notation/6800/5 "2022-03-08T15:47:59Z")

</div>

I understand. I will do that! Thank you 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DavidFuss](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/davidfuss/32/3846_2.png) [@DavidFuss](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/DavidFuss)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2022, 8:21pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/consistent-tuner-notation/6800/6 "2022-06-21T20:21:51Z")

</div>

CorOS 1.4.0 has another good option: just show both notations F#/Gb

@MP_Mod so this thread can be closed 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![M\_NDSP](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/m_ndsp/32/2281_2.png) [@M\_NDSP](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/M_NDSP)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2022, 11:21pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/consistent-tuner-notation/6800/7 "2022-06-21T23:21:53Z")

</div>