# 2C+ Plugin vs. "CA John's 2C" amp model?

**URL:** <https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/2c-plugin-vs-ca-johns-2c-amp-model/10283>\
**Category:** Quad Cortex\
**Created:** [March 6, 2023, 7:12pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/2c-plugin-vs-ca-johns-2c-amp-model/10283 "2023-03-06T19:12:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 14\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Andyjcp](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/andyjcp/32/2996_2.png) [@Andyjcp](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/Andyjcp)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2023, 7:12pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/2c-plugin-vs-ca-johns-2c-amp-model/10283/1 "2023-03-06T19:12:45Z")

</div>

Hi Cortexers,

Did one of you already compare the new plugin against the amp model?  
Would be interesting if they use the same algorithms or if something is different.

If no-one has checked so far, I will try on the weekend, however, my ears are not the best so I usually don’t spot each and every sound nuance.

EDIT  
Ok, my bad, I just realized that the JC 2C is a different amp than the 2C+, so my question may be a bit dumb…  
Sorry, forget about it 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Andyjcp](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/andyjcp/32/2996_2.png) [@Andyjcp](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/Andyjcp)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2023, 7:33pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/2c-plugin-vs-ca-johns-2c-amp-model/10283/3 "2023-03-06T19:33:23Z")

</div>

What I don’t really understand is why Neural does not create the QC amp models and the plugins in parallel.  
They could have used the same algorithms on the QC and the plugin.  
Instead, they implemented the 2C+ in the plugin and the JP 2C in the QC.  
Strange… But they probably have their reasons.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Teatime48](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/aca169/32.png) [@Teatime48](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/Teatime48)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2023, 10:40pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/2c-plugin-vs-ca-johns-2c-amp-model/10283/4 "2023-03-06T22:40:11Z")

</div>

In short they’re different algorithms or at least on a different platform. Hence why the plugins can’t be ported easily to the QC.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ipran](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/57b2e6/32.png) [@Ipran](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/Ipran)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2023, 4:17pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/2c-plugin-vs-ca-johns-2c-amp-model/10283/5 "2023-03-07T16:17:47Z")

</div>

What I know is plugins vs QC is different approach algorithms , while QC use robotic AI dialing thousands of combination of the real amp knob Meanwhile on the plugins is based on circuit modeling #CMIIW

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![metal86](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/47e85d/32.png) [@metal86](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/metal86)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2023, 7:18pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/2c-plugin-vs-ca-johns-2c-amp-model/10283/6 "2023-03-07T19:18:34Z")

</div>

I’m guessing they want people to buy both.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Andyjcp](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/andyjcp/32/2996_2.png) [@Andyjcp](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/Andyjcp)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2023, 7:24pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/2c-plugin-vs-ca-johns-2c-amp-model/10283/7 "2023-03-07T19:24:50Z")

</div>

Surprising, I always thought they would use the same neural networks or whatever it is for both plugins and QC.

And I will make a check this weekend with the Soldano plugin versus the QC model regarding sound differences.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomfs](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/tomfs/32/3645_2.png) [@tomfs](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/tomfs)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2023, 7:49pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/2c-plugin-vs-ca-johns-2c-amp-model/10283/8 "2023-03-07T19:49:27Z")

</div>

Bits will be the same, but bits will be very different.

Take the example if writing an app for iPhone and Android. It is possible to write the app then put it in a “wrapper” for the specific platform so you only have to write your app once.

However, you have to do it that way right from the start, and there are also limitations on the app by doing it that way. (Sometimes it’s actually more complicated and simply not worth it.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![xush](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/xush/32/5100_2.png) [@xush](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/xush)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2023, 9:02pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/2c-plugin-vs-ca-johns-2c-amp-model/10283/9 "2023-03-07T21:02:24Z")

</div>

they were different physical amps (vintage vs modern) so a shoot-out won’t tell you much.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Andyjcp](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/andyjcp/32/2996_2.png) [@Andyjcp](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/Andyjcp)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2023, 9:26pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/2c-plugin-vs-ca-johns-2c-amp-model/10283/10 "2023-03-07T21:26:42Z")

</div>

True, I realized after posting that it’s actually different amps (2C+ and JP 2C).

However, the SLO 100 amp model in the QC should be the same as the SLO 100 plugin, right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![xush](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/xush/32/5100_2.png) [@xush](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/xush)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2023, 9:36pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/2c-plugin-vs-ca-johns-2c-amp-model/10283/11 "2023-03-07T21:36:53Z")

</div>

No, I was referring to the Soldano.  
From Dan on Discord:  
“They’re models of completely different SLO versions. QC one is vintage, plugin is the re-release.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Andyjcp](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/andyjcp/32/2996_2.png) [@Andyjcp](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/Andyjcp)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2023, 9:48pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/2c-plugin-vs-ca-johns-2c-amp-model/10283/12 "2023-03-07T21:48:13Z")

</div>

Oh, thanks a lot then! You spared me the effort of comparing 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DarthV](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@DarthV](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/DarthV)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2023, 8:07pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/2c-plugin-vs-ca-johns-2c-amp-model/10283/13 "2023-03-18T20:07:00Z")

</div>

Love that they finally added a Mark series model to the QC with 2.0, but it’s pretty weird that the IIc+ is still on the release list from 2020 for the QC…and the plugins got it and the QC still doesn’t.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Andyjcp](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/unity.neuraldsp.com/andyjcp/32/2996_2.png) [@Andyjcp](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/Andyjcp)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2023, 10:24pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/2c-plugin-vs-ca-johns-2c-amp-model/10283/14 "2023-03-18T22:24:56Z")

</div>

On the other hand, as far as I understood, the JP 2C is anyway a renewed IIC+ with more channels and two EQs.  
I may not be musical enough to hear the nuances, but for my requirements, the JP 2C model in the QC covers everything.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DarthV](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@DarthV](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/u/DarthV)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2023, 10:57pm UTC](https://unity.neuraldsp.com/t/2c-plugin-vs-ca-johns-2c-amp-model/10283/15 "2023-03-18T22:57:24Z")

</div>

It’s a modern take on the IIc+, but it’s not the exact same nor has the same push/pull & class a mode. Is it better than scrolling through factory captures and hoping to find one that fits? Yes. Does the jp2c sound great. Yes. Is it’s a IIc+ like the plugin? No. The IIc+ is still listed on NDSP’s website for 2020 release amps, obviously they’ve had their hands on one, why don’t we get that on the QC.
